Traditional Republicanism on the Rehnquist Court

**

**

David Hackett Souter: Traditional Republican On The Rehnquist Court

by Tinsley E. Yarbrough

4.1 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3454 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	336 pages
Lending	:	Enabled
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE

The Rehnquist Court, led by Chief Justice William Rehnquist from 1986 to 2005, was one of the most conservative Supreme Courts in American history. The Court overturned many precedents established by the Warren Court of the 1950s and 1960s, and it upheld state laws that restricted abortion, affirmative action, and gay rights.

The Rehnquist Court's conservative jurisprudence was based on the principle of judicial restraint. This principle holds that judges should defer to the decisions of elected officials, even when those decisions are based on controversial or unpopular grounds. The Rehnquist Court believed that it was not the role of the judiciary to impose its own values on society.

The Rehnquist Court's decisions had a profound impact on American law and society. The Court's rulings on abortion, affirmative action, and gay rights have been particularly controversial. However, the Court's conservative jurisprudence has also been praised by some for its commitment to judicial restraint and for its respect for the separation of powers.

**Background**

William Rehnquist was appointed Chief Justice of the United States by President Ronald Reagan in 1986. Rehnquist had previously served as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court for 15 years. He was a conservative Republican, and his appointment was seen as a sign of the growing conservative influence in the federal judiciary.

The Supreme Court at the time of Rehnquist's appointment was deeply divided. The Court's liberal justices were led by Justice William Brennan, while the Court's conservative justices were led by Justice Antonin Scalia. Rehnquist's appointment gave the Court a 5-4 conservative majority.

**Judicial Philosophy**

Rehnquist's judicial philosophy was based on the principle of judicial restraint. This principle holds that judges should defer to the decisions of elected officials, even when those decisions are based on controversial or unpopular grounds. Rehnquist believed that it was not the role of the judiciary to impose its own values on society.

Rehnquist's judicial restraint stemmed from his belief in the separation of powers. He believed that the judiciary should not interfere with the decisions of the legislative and executive branches of government. He also believed that the judiciary should not create new rights that are not explicitly protected by the Constitution.

**Key Decisions**

The Rehnquist Court issued a number of landmark decisions that had a profound impact on American law and society. Some of the Court's most important decisions include:

• **Roe v. Wade (1973)**: The Court ruled that a woman's right to have an abortion is protected by the Constitution. This decision was overturned by the Court in 2022 in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
• **Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)**: The Court ruled that race can be used as a factor in college admissions, but that quotas are unconstitutional. This decision was a compromise between the Court's liberal and conservative justices.
• **Bush v. Gore (2000)**: The Court ruled that the Florida Supreme Court had overstepped its authority in ordering a recount of the 2000 presidential election. This decision effectively handed the election to George W. Bush.
• **Lawrence v. Texas (2003)**: The Court ruled that laws criminalizing homosexual sodomy are unconstitutional. This decision was a major victory for gay rights advocates.

**Legacy**

The Rehnquist Court was one of the most conservative Supreme Courts in American history. The Court's decisions had a profound impact on American law and society. The Court's conservative jurisprudence has been praised by some for its commitment to judicial restraint and for its respect for the separation of powers. However, the Court's decisions have also been criticized by others for their impact on civil rights and social justice.

The long-term legacy of the Rehnquist Court is still being debated. However, there is no doubt that the Court was a major force in American law and politics for over two decades.

****

David Hackett Souter: Traditional Republican On The Rehnquist Court

by Tinsley E. Yarbrough

4.1 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3454 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	336 pages
Lending	:	Enabled
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE